On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have spent some time on rebasing the cegcc-binutils branch on
> upstream version 2.21.1. That was a big knot which became smaller and
> smaller each time I rebased incrementally on a new release.
> Fortunately, many of the cegcc
Hello,
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:34:05 +0100
Max Kellermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have spent some time on rebasing the cegcc-binutils branch on
> upstream version 2.21.1. That was a big knot which became smaller and
> smaller each time I rebased incrementally on a new release.
> Fortunately, many of
Hi,
I have spent some time on rebasing the cegcc-binutils branch on
upstream version 2.21.1. That was a big knot which became smaller and
smaller each time I rebased incrementally on a new release.
Fortunately, many of the cegcc patches were merged upstream, and
disappeared from my rebasing branc
