> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Backx [mailto:danny.ba...@scarlet.be]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 16:20
> To: Pavel Pavlov
> Cc: cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
>
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:59 -0400, Pav
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 08:23 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> > I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> > svn if you like.
>
> Hi Danny & Pavel,
>
> I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> foun
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:59 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> After checking some files I noticed that VERSIONS file and checked out
> octorer 17 2009 version of binutils. I merged all the changes into
> latest version of binutils. Also, I noticed that versions of binutils
> in cegcc svn has some strang
> > On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> >> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> >> svn if you like.
> >
> > Hi Danny & Pavel,
> >
> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumber
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Backx [mailto:danny.ba...@scarlet.be]
> Cc: cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
>
> On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 19:41 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> > I'm thinking to update my version of
