On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:31:38 +, "Hywel B. Richards"
wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
>>
>> NO and NO!
>> I am talking about Windows Mobile >= 5 not Windows CE ,just for
>> information
>>
>> Windows Mobile 5 = ARM + windows ce 5.1 + specific GUI
>> Windows Mobile 6 = ARM + windows ce 5.2 + specifi
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:13 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:15:08 +0100, Danny Backx
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:45 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> >> binaries generated by cegcc cannot be run on windows mobile >= 5
> without
> >> packing them
> >> or modifying registry.
> >
Vincent R. wrote:
>
> NO and NO!
> I am talking about Windows Mobile >= 5 not Windows CE ,just for
> information
>
> Windows Mobile 5 = ARM + windows ce 5.1 + specific GUI
> Windows Mobile 6 = ARM + windows ce 5.2 + specific GUI
>
> and you know that cegcc binaries don't work on Windows Mobile .
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:15:08 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:45 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
>> binaries generated by cegcc cannot be run on windows mobile >= 5
without
>> packing them
>> or modifying registry.
>
> I don't think this is entirely accurate. CE complains but allows
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:45 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> binaries generated by cegcc cannot be run on windows mobile >= 5 without
> packing them
> or modifying registry.
I don't think this is entirely accurate. CE complains but allows you to
run them.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - a
