On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
> Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
> sensible.
>
> Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
>
> Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I see no complaints
> so the new release must work. Right ?
>
> 7. Webs
Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
sensible.
Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I see no complaints
so the new release must work. Right ?
1. I'm slowly working on gdb improvements for accepting dos style
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 08:40 +0200, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> Has anyone tried to link an executable that consists of some libraries
> compiled with msvc and some with cegcc? Will that work?
I seem to recall that this has popped up and got answered a long time
ago but I cannot seem to find it in ar
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 13:18 +0200, Vincent R. wrote:
> Forget my previous patch it doesn't work ...
When someone else is doing the work, I can be very patient :-)
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 01:24 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Hi cegcc folks,
>
> I'm a new developer on the XCSoar project (www.xcsoar.org). We try to
> support all PocketPC versions. The fellow developer who maintains the
> XCSoar PPC2000 port claims that cegcc cannot produce binaries for that
>
Forget my previous patch it doesn't work ...
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerr
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:26:52 +0100, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>
>> Seriously : I've not looked into objc at all. Does it have porting
>> issues like the rest of gcc/g++/libg++ or does it sit quietly on top of
>> gcc ?
>
> Generally speaking, it "just works": if C works, ObjC works,
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:26:52 +0100, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>
>> Seriously : I've not looked into objc at all. Does it have porting
>> issues like the rest of gcc/g++/libg++ or does it sit quietly on top of
>> gcc ?
>
> Generally speaking, it "just works": if C works, ObjC works,
Danny Backx wrote:
> Seriously : I've not looked into objc at all. Does it have porting
> issues like the rest of gcc/g++/libg++ or does it sit quietly on top of
> gcc ?
Generally speaking, it "just works": if C works, ObjC works, and if C++
works, Obj-C++ works. I've never had to patch either
