Hi Jaroslaw,
>I would like to inform you that MS Device Emulator IS working on wine.
>All you have to do is to install it on MS Windows, and copy its whole
>directory to your linux box. Similar thing with emulator images. I just
>tested this with Device Emulator 3.0, and WM6.1 Professional images.
Hello,
I would like to inform you that MS Device Emulator IS working on wine.
All you have to do is to install it on MS Windows, and copy its whole
directory to your linux box. Similar thing with emulator images. I just
tested this with Device Emulator 3.0, and WM6.1 Professional images.
Best reg
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Danny Backx wrote:
> I did some of this already. More comment ?
>
>Danny
I like this page more than the old one.
One thing I would add is a Home link in the menu, or making the whole yellow
rectangle in the title clickable to return to the initial page.
hey,
according to msdn (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms909872.aspx)
this value (and other ones too) belong to shobjidl.h and not shlobj.h
(which is the correct header in win32).
the shobjidl.h file does not exist.
Is it normal ?
Vincent Torri
-
Hey,
in io.h, shouldn't struct _finddata_t be guarded by _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED
(like _fsize_t is guarded by _FSIZE_T_DEFINED) ?
Vincent Torri
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Da
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 16:24 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > I did some of this already. More comment ?
>
> * no frames (use css instead). Hence the menu and the content will have
> the same width.
Do you know of another way to separate the menu d
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
I did some of this already. More comment ?
* no frames (use css instead). Hence the menu and the content will have
the same width.
* well, I'm not a big fan of the chosen colors :)
* you can move the "Software Version" to "Download", where you put
I did some of this already. More comment ?
Danny
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 16:31 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > I've updated http://cegcc.sourceforge.net
> >
> > Is this an improvement, or the opposite ? Suggestions welcome, I'm not
> > good at
