Re: [Cegcc-devel] Getting the new configure triplet names into upstream binutils (PING Pedro A.)

2009-05-26 Thread Dave Korn
Vincent R. wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 20:08:10 +0100, Dave Korn >> I >> haven't tried to extract any of the functional patches from your tree > yet, > Generally here is the patch I am using, maybe you could make a diff. > When looking very quickly I could not see pe-dll.c changes. That is wh

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Getting the new configure triplet names into upstream binutils (PING Pedro A.)

2009-05-26 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 26 May 2009 20:08:10 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > Hi cegcc-devel, > > I think it would be helpful to have your new target-names implemented in > upstream binutils, and to that end I've extracted a bunch of patches from > your > CVS and the related ChangeLog entries. I've also written a bu

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Getting the new configure triplet names into upstream binutils (PING Pedro A.)

2009-05-26 Thread Danny Backx
I only browsed the patch, no high quality check. You certainly have my blessing. Danny On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:08 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > Hi cegcc-devel, > > I think it would be helpful to have your new target-names implemented in > upstream binutils, and to that end I've extracted

Re: [Cegcc-devel] mingw32ce 0.55 for cygwin

2009-05-26 Thread Danny Backx
There's no release of cegcc based on gcc 4.4.x out right now. Only an experimental version that is known to have at least one major problem (with floating point types). Danny On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 17:32 +0200, InfoMail InfoMail wrote: > Is there a version of the new mingw32ce (based on gc

Re: [Cegcc-devel] For the adventurous : gcc 4.4.0 for mingw32ce

2009-05-26 Thread Danny Backx
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:41 +0200, Vincent R. wrote: > When testing with my own version of cegcc-4.4.0(I dont' have reported > your recent mingw stuff about printf) I have : > > Yow 16.00 2.00 -0.00 > a 00 00 00 00 00 00 30 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4

[Cegcc-devel] Getting the new configure triplet names into upstream binutils (PING Pedro A.)

2009-05-26 Thread Dave Korn
Hi cegcc-devel, I think it would be helpful to have your new target-names implemented in upstream binutils, and to that end I've extracted a bunch of patches from your CVS and the related ChangeLog entries. I've also written a bunch of patches for the upstream testsuite and although it's n

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Error when compiling SVN

2009-05-26 Thread Danny Backx
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 15:08 +0200, Vincent R. wrote: > Danny in your build script please modify the line like this : > > tail --lines=+$L2 ${INCFILE} >>${DESTFILE} > > or it won't build on cygwin. Done Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info --

Re: [Cegcc-devel] For the adventurous : gcc 4.4.0 for mingw32ce

2009-05-26 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 26 May 2009 17:50:10 +0200, "Vincent R." wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:41:08 +0200, "Vincent R." > wrote: >> On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:00 +0200, Danny Backx >> wrote: >>> Haven't figured out the extent of the problem yet, part or all of it may >>> be double alignment. >>> >>> Here is

Re: [Cegcc-devel] For the adventurous : gcc 4.4.0 for mingw32ce

2009-05-26 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:41:08 +0200, "Vincent R." wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:00 +0200, Danny Backx > wrote: >> Haven't figured out the extent of the problem yet, part or all of it may >> be double alignment. >> >> Here is (first) ARM output, then linux output. >> >> pavilion: {1254} rsh

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Default stack size for x86?

2009-05-26 Thread Johnny Willemsen
Hi, > Hmm, that could be a problem either in stack probing or in the > calculation > layout and handling of large stack frames. I haven't tried the x86 > compiler > yet but I'll probably take a look at it some time soon-ish. Thanks already. Danny will probably pick up his x86 target today, the

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Error when compiling SVN

2009-05-26 Thread Dave Korn
Vincent R. wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 15:00:35 +0200, "Vincent R." > wrote: >> On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:58:12 +0200, "Vincent R." > >>> `/home/Vincent/projects/cegcc/src/scripts/build/w32api/libce' >>> tail: cannot open `+18' for reading: No such file or directory >>> >>> Any idea why ? >> Hum w

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Default stack size for x86?

2009-05-26 Thread Dave Korn
Johnny Willemsen wrote: > Hi, > >>> It seems -Wl,--stack=0x800 works: >>> SizeOfStackReserve 0800 >>> SizeOfStackCommit 1000 >>> SizeOfHeapReserve 0010 >>> SizeOfHeapCommit1000 >>> >>> The question is more how this is use

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Error when compiling SVN

2009-05-26 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 26 May 2009 15:00:35 +0200, "Vincent R." wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:58:12 +0200, "Vincent R." > wrote: >> I tried to compile SVN and I think it could have been a good idea >> to allow build script to choose between 4.1 and 4.4 because by default >> it compiles 4.4. >> Then I het the

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Error when compiling SVN

2009-05-26 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:58:12 +0200, "Vincent R." wrote: > I tried to compile SVN and I think it could have been a good idea > to allow build script to choose between 4.1 and 4.4 because by default > it compiles 4.4. > Then I het the following error whan compiling w32api : > > mkdir -p /home/Vinc

[Cegcc-devel] Error when compiling SVN

2009-05-26 Thread Vincent R.
I tried to compile SVN and I think it could have been a good idea to allow build script to choose between 4.1 and 4.4 because by default it compiles 4.4. Then I het the following error whan compiling w32api : mkdir -p /home/Vincent/toolchains/mingw32ce-4.1.0/arm-mingw32ce/include/GL for i in gl.h

Re: [Cegcc-devel] For the adventurous : gcc 4.4.0 for mingw32ce

2009-05-26 Thread Vincent R.
On Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:00 +0200, Danny Backx wrote: > Haven't figured out the extent of the problem yet, part or all of it may > be double alignment. > > Here is (first) ARM output, then linux output. > > pavilion: {1254} rsh ipaq /temp/f > Yow 16.00 2.00 -0.00 > a 00 00 00