Re: [Cegcc-devel] using -static

2009-05-17 Thread Johnny Willemsen
Hi, > I think we have this, but with dll's we didn't use the lib prefix which > also > worked, but probably with static we need the lib prefix. We will update > our > build files tomorrow and try with the lib prefix. With lib prefix and static linking the exception test as part of ACE does work.

Re: [Cegcc-devel] using -static

2009-05-17 Thread Johnny Willemsen
Hi, > > Seems -static doesn't work yet for ACE. When I create the ACE.dll, > and want > > to link it with an executable using -static, which files do I now > need? Ld > > complains that it can't find -lACE, do I need ACE.a, ACE.lib? > > If you create dynamic / shared libraries / dlls, then the wa

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Controlling architecture on binaries built

2009-05-17 Thread Danny Backx
I am not certain about your assessment. If your device has an arm920t then according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture (if I read it correctly) this should not be the problem. Can you specify in more detail what works and what doesn't, so we can try to assess where the problem is ?

Re: [Cegcc-devel] using -static

2009-05-17 Thread Danny Backx
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 09:55 +0200, Johnny Willemsen wrote: > > I think I mixed two options at our side. I am retesting with just - > > static at > > this moment. > > Seems -static doesn't work yet for ACE. When I create the ACE.dll, and want > to link it with an executable using -static, which fil

Re: [Cegcc-devel] using -static

2009-05-17 Thread Johnny Willemsen
Hi, > I think I mixed two options at our side. I am retesting with just - > static at > this moment. Seems -static doesn't work yet for ACE. When I create the ACE.dll, and want to link it with an executable using -static, which files do I now need? Ld complains that it can't find -lACE, do I need