I've asked about the STACKSIZE issue on the binutils mailing list.
Danny
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 01:32 +0200, Ismail Khatib wrote:
> Am 16.04.2009 um 19:52 schrieb Danny Backx:
> > I have questions about your submissions. With some answers, I can
> > commit
> > stuff to the SVN.
> >
> > W
Am 16.04.2009 um 19:52 schrieb Danny Backx:
> I have questions about your submissions. With some answers, I can
> commit
> stuff to the SVN.
>
> Would it work on your target if we said something like
> #ifdef __DARWIN_UNIX03
> %token NAME LIBRARY DESCRIPTION LEOPARD_STACKSIZE
> %token HEAPSIZE C
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Yeah, It's been like that for months in a row. I'm sorry that
> this happens. I did see your posts at gcc@ and gcc-patches@ (I don't
> read gcc-help, though), and I can feel your pain... Believe me,
> I do want to get our gcc stuff upstream.
>
> As I
OMG, is that all it took? Did it work OK? Is there an easy way
to try out this i386/CE stuff? Like, is there a free emulator
or something? It would be great if it was documented on
the wiki.
On Friday 17 April 2009 19:16:27, Danny Backx wrote:
> The solution to build gdbserver cleanly is not h
I'm just finding out about all this great work you guys have
been up on getting building a i386-mingw32ce. This is great stuff!
On Thursday 16 April 2009 18:34:38, Danny Backx wrote:
> Depending on whether binutils stays the same, I'd say the
> src/mingw/include/_mingw.h file needs to change so t
Hi Dave,
On Friday 03 April 2009 11:17:53, Dave Korn wrote:
> I just subbed up to drop you this note, I'll be unsubbing again shortly,
> glad to know I didn't cause you any problems. I just dropped by because as
> far as I know you guys are at the heart of open-source arm-wince-pe activity -
>
On Sunday 29 March 2009 11:53:09, Vincent R. wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:02:05 +0100, Danny Backx
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 17:57 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
> >> > You'd also need :
> >> > - binutils (but that's already in good shape)
> >>
On Saturday 28 March 2009 16:57:09, Vincent Torri wrote:
> another thing: another Vincent proposed to move libce to mingw-w64 (there
> are already libw32 and libw64 there). What do you think of that ?
I haven't read the rest of the thread yet, but I see no
point in that.
--
Pedro Alves
---
Oh gosh, time flies, sorry about that.
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 20:25:36, Danny Backx wrote:
> Apologies for not replying sooner. Busy busy.
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 05:42 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> > I'm filing an "Intent to Package" which wants to know:
> >
> > * Version? Is there a more re
Maybe you could start with the mkspecs in my old Qt-4.1 CE port.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.cegcc.devel/375
There's probably other stuff there you could reuse.
On Friday 27 March 2009 06:56:03, Sébastien Lorquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I already had you idea months ago, the qt guys told
Hi,
> The solution to build gdbserver cleanly is not hard, see below. After
> confirmation from you, I'll submit this to the appropriate gdb mailing
> list.
We have spend most of the time today to try to get an ACE test running, but
they crash at start of the application. Continuing that next wee
The solution to build gdbserver cleanly is not hard, see below. After
confirmation from you, I'll submit this to the appropriate gdb mailing
list.
Danny
dannypc: {621} diff -c configure.srv.orig configure.srv
*** configure.srv.orig 2009-04-17 20:04:04.0 +0200
--- configure.srv
Hi,
Thanks, we are going to compile ACE/TAO for cegcc x86 and see if we can run
one of our basic tests on the target. We will keep you informed on the
results.
Marcel, can you compile your ACE tree and try OS_Test on the x86 target?
Johnny
> Everything except src/profile compiles on my system.
13 matches
Mail list logo
