On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 22:06 -0600, Brad Riensche wrote:
> I agree, but then again, neither of those parties has any vested
> interest in my using cegcc. But we have digressed from my original
> question, which was: has any cegcc user successfully used the
> PlaySound() function. If the answer
On Sunday 08 February 2009 04:06:43, Brad Riensche wrote:
> I agree, but then again, neither of those parties has any vested
> interest in my using cegcc. But we have digressed from my original
> question, which was: has any cegcc user successfully used the
> PlaySound() function. If the answe
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Saturday 07 February 2009 05:27:13, Brad and Tracy Riensche wrote:
>
I don't think I can use gdb on my hardware, unless someone has a magic
trick to show me.
>>> Sounds like it would be useful to teach gdbserver how to talk through th
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:55:36, Vincent R. wrote:
> 2) I made a patch for mingw to use static crt, it will be consistent with
> future cegcc-4.4
> and with mingw-w64. Now I need people to test it and if it works fine we
> could apply it to
> current svn.
Sorry, but I don't like this patch --
On Friday 06 February 2009 01:01:36, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I've updated it locally, and resolved most conflicts. I'm doing to
> do a bit of testing and then I'll check it in.
>
Done, we're now based on upstream MinGW 3.15.2.
I've updated w32api as well --- now at upstream version 3.12.
To try it
On Saturday 07 February 2009 05:27:13, Brad and Tracy Riensche wrote:
>
> >> I don't think I can use gdb on my hardware, unless someone has a magic
> >> trick to show me.
> >>
> >
> > Sounds like it would be useful to teach gdbserver how to talk through the
> > serial
> > port on windows
Patches item #2574606, was opened at 2009-02-07 00:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865516&aid=2574606&group_id=173455
Please note that this message will contain a full co
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 21:32, Vincent R. wrote:
> I don't understand, once again I am NOT SAYING TO COPY PASTE from MS
> include
> but how do you think mingw folks find the values, I don't think they
> reverse-engineer
> they just look at MS include and declare in their includes.
Actually, you're
