Re: [Cegcc-devel] Compiling for WinCE/SH4

2009-01-30 Thread Hywel B. Richards
Thanks for the replies. I think I might need a bit more help with this one! I downloaded cegcc and the nearest version I could find of binutils (Sticky Date: 2008.01.06.00.00.00) and version 4.1.0 of gcc, to do diffs to analyse the changes as suggested by Vincent. I started out by compiling ceg

Re: [Cegcc-devel] using PlaySound() with cegcc

2009-01-30 Thread Lars Munch
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:38:22PM -0600, Brad Riensche wrote: > Has anyone used the PlaySound API call with cegcc? I can't make it > work, but I have limited debugging capability at the moment. It would > be nice to rule out ordinal mis-matches, etc. Limited debugging capability? have a look here

Re: [Cegcc-devel] error: cannot find ltdl.h - when compile the cacao JVM

2009-01-30 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Ryan Raasch wrote: One could also use libevil, from the Enlightenment Libraries. It is a library used by the e libraries to support those function calls. It does not have any dependencies. Vincent Torri knows best :) Danny Backx wrote: That's probably because the conten

Re: [Cegcc-devel] error: cannot find ltdl.h - when compile the cacao JVM

2009-01-30 Thread 杨永志
Thank you for your advices. I think the error means cacao can not find a suitable libtool. So i download GNU libtool (2.2.6) and build it with AR=arm-cegcc-ar AS=arm-cegcc-as CXX=arm-cegcc-c++ CPP=arm-cegcc-cpp CC=arm-cegcc-gcc LD=arm-cegcc-ld DLLTOOL=arm-cegcc-dlltool NM=arm-cegcc-nm RANLIB=arm-

Re: [Cegcc-devel] error: cannot find ltdl.h - when compile the cacao JVM

2009-01-30 Thread Ryan Raasch
One could also use libevil, from the Enlightenment Libraries. It is a library used by the e libraries to support those function calls. It does not have any dependencies. Vincent Torri knows best :) Ryan Danny Backx wrote: > That's probably because the contents of ltdl.h is not supported on > W