On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:55:54 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> This doesn't look like a structure that's included in one of our tools,
> it looks like something that might get filled up when our DLL gets
> loaded.
>
> Then we would need to figure out which entry in the structures created
> by binutils
This doesn't look like a structure that's included in one of our tools,
it looks like something that might get filled up when our DLL gets
loaded.
Then we would need to figure out which entry in the structures created
by binutils and/or gcc is responsible for filling up this field.
Or am I comple
Thanks, committed.
Danny
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:09 +0100, mosfet wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:29:30 +0100, Danny Backx
> wrote:
> > Looks clean :-)
> >
> > Have you checked whether windres still works with other existing RC
> > files ?
> >
> > Danny
> >
> yes I ckeched and no
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:26:05 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> What's an o32_ptr ?
>
> Does all this mean that we're not filling up a structure in the DLL, and
> that UPX is doing the right thing but we're not ?
>
> Danny
>
Yes o32_ptr is part of the PE format :
//
// MODULE structure, one for
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:29:30 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> Looks clean :-)
>
> Have you checked whether windres still works with other existing RC
> files ?
>
> Danny
>
yes I ckeched and now we support all configurations, for instance if we
take the HelloSP as example :
NO COMMA:
-
> Lachezar Dobrev a écrit :
>
> You may have a look at wtl using visual studio or evc4, it works quite well.
> Noël
Yeah. Done that.
This works, but let me point out that it's designed to run under
Windows, which although acceptable in the long run is something I
would like to avoid. I would li
