On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:08:29 +0100, mosfet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About the WM6.1 issue, in the case newer gcc\binutils doesn't solve the
> issue I am following another
> track.
> Actually the problem with WM6.1 comes from a modification done in the
> kernel(nk.exe) and especially
> in the lo
About the WM6.1 issue, in the case newer gcc\binutils doesn't solve the
issue I am following another
track.
Actually the problem with WM6.1 comes from a modification done in the
kernel(nk.exe) and especially
in the loader. What you need to know is the fact Microsoft give access to
Windows CE source
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:55:25 +0100, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Actually I think it's time to move to new versions of the tools. That
> includes gcc itself. Vincent has done excellent work on getting a cegcc
> to work based on gcc-4.3.2, we should pick that up.
>
> Opinions ?
>
>
I don't see a problem with having a private version of libtool for a
while. After all, we do this with several tools.
Danny
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 08:54 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > Actually I think it's time to move to new versions of the
