On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Danny Backx wrote:
> Actually I think it's time to move to new versions of the tools. That
> includes gcc itself. Vincent has done excellent work on getting a cegcc
> to work based on gcc-4.3.2, we should pick that up.
>
> Opinions ?
A remark, actually: I have reported some
Actually I think it's time to move to new versions of the tools. That
includes gcc itself. Vincent has done excellent work on getting a cegcc
to work based on gcc-4.3.2, we should pick that up.
Opinions ?
Danny
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 17:56 +0100, mosfet wrote:
> Pedro,
>
> I forgot to a
Pedro,
I forgot to ask you if you have time, would it be possible to incorporate
into cegcc a recent version
of binutils >= 2.18.50.
I was looking into mingw mailing list and I found this :
-
"FWIW recent 2.18.50 snapsho
