Re: [Cegcc-devel] secext.h header: wrong guards

2008-10-07 Thread Pedro Alves
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 17:53:02, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Pedro Alves wrote: > > How about: > > > > #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0500) || (_WIN32_WCE >= 0x0400) > > > > ? > > I think it's good. After having passed -D_WIN32_WCE=0x0420 to the preproc, > it is compiling. > > I would

Re: [Cegcc-devel] secext.h header: wrong guards

2008-10-07 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Tuesday 07 October 2008 16:37:28, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> I send a mail about that specific problem. >> >> in secext.h, all the declarations are guarded by >> >> >> #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0500) >> >> Which is wrong, I think :) >> >> I don't know what

Re: [Cegcc-devel] WCETRACE changes

2008-10-07 Thread Pawel Veselov
Here is an updated version. Thanks! Pawel. On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A Tuesday 07 October 2008 01:43:57, Pawel Veselov escreveu: >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tuesday 07 October 2008 00

Re: [Cegcc-devel] secext.h header: wrong guards

2008-10-07 Thread Pedro Alves
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 16:37:28, Vincent Torri wrote: > I send a mail about that specific problem. > > in secext.h, all the declarations are guarded by > > > #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0500) > > Which is wrong, I think :) > > I don't know what to use here. The msdn doc is here: > > http://ms

[Cegcc-devel] secext.h header: wrong guards

2008-10-07 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, I send a mail about that specific problem. in secext.h, all the declarations are guarded by #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0500) Which is wrong, I think :) I don't know what to use here. The msdn doc is here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa908722.aspx It seems that it exists from W