Re: [Cegcc-devel] mingw32ce profiling

2008-08-22 Thread Danny Backx
It used to work at some point, see the documentation on http://cegcc.sf.net . Unfortunately I can't test right now because I am just switching PDA's and not everything is set up yet. (Need to upgrade a few things and I won't have time during this weekend.) Danny On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 04:

Re: [Cegcc-devel] mingw32ce profiling

2008-08-22 Thread janrinze
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 04:55 +1000, John Wharington wrote: > Well, that's the version I downloaded, the tarball is called 4.1.2 > (found a link to a build someone made earlier this year). > > But in any case, I also tried it with 0.51 and it didn't work then > either. Could it be that profiling on

Re: [Cegcc-devel] mingw32ce profiling

2008-08-22 Thread John Wharington
Well, that's the version I downloaded, the tarball is called 4.1.2 (found a link to a build someone made earlier this year). But in any case, I also tried it with 0.51 and it didn't work then either. Could it be that profiling only works under cegcc not mingw32ce? On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:08 +02

Re: [Cegcc-devel] xxx is not a valid Pocket PC application if SizeOfImage>10000

2008-08-22 Thread Jérôme Decoodt
Hello, > DWORD SizeOfImage > This appears to be the total size of the portions of the image > that the loader has to worry about. It is the size of the region > starting at the image base up to the end of the last section. > The end of the last section is rounded up

Re: [Cegcc-devel] mingw32ce profiling

2008-08-22 Thread forumer
Hi, You mean arm-mingw32ce version 4.1.0 because I there is no 4.1.2... On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:38:01 +1000, John Wharington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been unable to get any profile build (-pg) of applications to run. > arm-mingw32ce version 4.1.2 > > Is this broken? > >