0
#define __CEGCC_VERSION_MINOR__ 51
#define __CEGCC_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL__ 0
#define __CEGCC_BUILD_DATE__ 20071206
/* Automatic changes above */
#define __CEGCC_VERSION__ \
(((__CEGCC_VERSION_MAJOR__) << 16)
+ ((__CEGCC_VERSION_MINOR__) << 8)
+ (
> I can (and I'm inclined to) make the DLLs available as a separate
> download. There would be two advantages to this : you could benefit, and
> it would get tested.
Why not put them in, by default, and let the people choose which one they
want to use?
If you really want to make a new binary rele
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 08:53 +0100, Jacek M. Holeczek wrote:
> > Doesn't use of a DLL remove most of this whole issue ?
>
> Yes, I believe so.
> However, is there any definite plan to switch to shared libstdc++ for
> the mingw32ce target?
Pedro recently asked not to put this in the release because
