Re: [Cegcc-devel] size od CeGCC generated code

2007-12-02 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:51:18AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > When I went through this exercise, I just started commenting out stuff > to see what was forcing the exceptions into the exe. I got down to > the following stuff still needed from libsupc++.a: > > undefined reference to `vtable for

Re: [Cegcc-devel] size od CeGCC generated code

2007-12-02 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:41:17AM +, Pedro Alves wrote: > Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > Unfortunately, try as I might, I could not get haret (see > > http://www.handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/HaRET) to shrink with > > -fno-exceptions. As a guess, it looks like anything that requires > > libsupc++.a

[Cegcc-devel] Porting GHC through cegcc

2007-12-02 Thread Iván Pérez Domínguez
Hi, I'm trying to port a Haskell compiler to PocketPC, but right after trying some trivial things and before going into modifying the back-ends, I thought you guys would know better than me what the status of cegcc currently is. The question is this simple: do you think it can be done with any

Re: [Cegcc-devel] DLL building process

2007-12-02 Thread Danny Backx
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 19:39 +, Pedro Alves wrote: > Danny Backx wrote: > > Question #2. I've created a Makefile for my "poor man's MFC". In it, > > I've put some logic that I extracted from the script mentioned above. > > I've attached the Makefile. It appears to work for me. Is it correct ? >