Re: [Cegcc-devel] mingw32ce exeption handling for dynamic object -

2007-11-29 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, I don't have any cegcc at hand for the moment so I cannot check it, but ... I believe, the linker sets some default maximal sizes for sections, including the stack/heap (you can increase them using some linker flags). While looking at a problem, that I met some time ago, I noticed that the ce

Re: [Cegcc-devel] size od CeGCC generated code

2007-11-29 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
See question/answer 10 in my FAQ for explanations (in short, the 40kB size difference came from the "exception handling" code). Best regards, Jacek. - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from

Re: [Cegcc-devel] size od CeGCC generated code

2007-11-29 Thread Danny Backx
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 18:01 +0100, Jacek M. Holeczek wrote: > A simple ".exe" compiled with MS C++ is about 3 kB long, the same code > compiled with CeGCC is about 40 kB long. > Similarly, a ".dll" compiled with MS C++ is about 39 kB long, the same > code compiled with CeGCC is about 89 kB long. >

[Cegcc-devel] mingw32ce exeption handling for dynamic object -

2007-11-29 Thread Steve DeLaney
This turned out to be a false lead that I tracked down in another component. As it turns out there is actually a stack of 3 inherited classes, base foo : base() bar : foo() and I was able to confirm all 3 base constructors are working OK, base, foo, and bar. the problem is in anot