"%wc" is Microsoft extension, not supported in every Std C Library. So
if we don't want to print "%wc%wc%wc%wc%..." instead of real chars, we
shall not use it.
Before:
%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wcession[28326]:
_Tt_s_session::s_init(): 1051 (TT_ERR_INTERNAL)!
%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%wc%w
sizeof(char*) has been used in an attempt to get string's length.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x75912dfa in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=0x7fffdf60,
format=, ap=0x7fffe080) at vfprintf.c:1614
1614vfprintf.c: No such file or directory.
in vfprint
And please, don't forget to mention mblamer from #cde as co-author.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers ca
http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/manulix/CDE/cde-configRun_tweaks.patch
cde-configRun_tweaks.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
t
-- Forwarded message --
From: Douglas Mencken
Date: Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] some tweaks for configRun:
add -h/--usage option, use portable print instead of echo \c, etc.
To: Marc Balmer
> what is the gain of replacing echo w
> I am pretty sure that 'echo -n' and 'echo -e' work everywhere. Why
> not use those instead?
printf is available everywhere; "echo -n" is an exotic, "echo -e" is
much more exotic
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Excl
