Marc Balmer writes:
>I'd like to raise the question if we want such C++ style comments or if
>we shouldn't stick with pure C comments? (Which I personally would
>prefer, so stay compatible with older compilers)
I personally prefer a C89 style, with no C++ comments.
--
Aaron W. Hsu | arcf...@s
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 08.08.12 09:05, schrieb Frederic Koehler:
[...]
>> -if (stat(TtMntTab, &mount_table_stat)) {
>> +// Must use lstat here; mtab is often a symlink
>
> I'd like to raise the question if we want such C++ style comments or if
> we shou
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Frederic Koehler wrote:
Some comments below:
> Thanks for the feedback; here are some revised patches
> and a third group of patches which fix enough segfaults
> by removing implicit function definitions
> to allow CDE to startup on x64, albeit to a very buggy desktop.
>
> ===
Am 08.08.12 09:05, schrieb Frederic Koehler:
> Thanks for the feedback; here are some revised patches
> and a third group of patches which fix enough segfaults
> by removing implicit function definitions
> to allow CDE to startup on x64, albeit to a very buggy desktop.
>
> ==
> Av
Thanks for the feedback; here are some revised patches
and a third group of patches which fix enough segfaults
by removing implicit function definitions
to allow CDE to startup on x64, albeit to a very buggy desktop.
==
Avoid an infinite loop in ttsession (tooltalk daemon) when /et
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Frederic Koehler wrote:
> Hi, I was trying to figure out why CDE does not want to run on some
> distros, including
> the latest release of Fedora. These two patches are enough to get dtwm to
> run.
> The first is important, because it allows ToolTalk to work which dtwm is
> rel
