On 1/21/19 6:55 PM, Chase wrote:
> Maybe it wasn't the correct word, but in Imake, you can implement things like
> "LinkSourceFile()" which has Imake replace that and it's argument with the
> correct implementation of a symlink build instruction on make, autotools
> doesn't have that functionali
Maybe it wasn't the correct word, but in Imake, you can implement things like
"LinkSourceFile()" which has Imake replace that and it's argument with the
correct implementation of a symlink build instruction on make, autotools
doesn't have that functionality as far as I've read.
Thank you for y
On 1/21/19 4:22 PM, Chase wrote:
> I did see this, but doesn't the preprocessor define instances of v_io_buf as
> it's ptr version? Or is that only
Only if if C_API is defined. Otherwise v_io_buf is used.
>> would take me a long time to write makefile.ams for due to the fact that
>>> as far as
I did see this, but doesn't the preprocessor define instances of v_io_buf as
it's ptr version? Or is that only within that file? And what about the
references to dtxlate stuff from the exported version of DtMmdb? I have no idea
where to start there. C_API is defined during compilation (all I did
On 1/21/19 2:07 PM, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The further and further I delve into the document building system in
> CDE, the more of a trainwreck I see that it is.
>
:)
> I have been working on the autotools port, and one point of interest I
> am running into continuousl
Hi all,
The further and further I delve into the document building system in CDE, the
more of a trainwreck I see that it is.
I have been working on the autotools port, and one point of interest I am
running into continuously is the issue of downsizing duplicate code. I have
successfully done t
