Ha, never mind. I've applied them - not used to getting properly
formatted patches in the mail body :)
-jon
On 7/4/21 1:05 PM, Jon Trulson wrote:
Hi, could you send these patches (this one and the following 2
patches) in the proper git format-patch format?
Otherwise I have to manually apply
Hi, could you send these patches (this one and the following 2 patches)
in the proper git format-patch format?
Otherwise I have to manually apply them, create a commit message for
them, etc... I don't have that kind of time.
-jon
On 7/4/21 8:22 AM, Adam Sampson wrote:
When building a progra
---
cde/lib/DtSvc/DtUtil2/SunDtHelp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/cde/lib/DtSvc/DtUtil2/SunDtHelp.c
b/cde/lib/DtSvc/DtUtil2/SunDtHelp.c
index aa7a15fc5..759a87554 100644
--- a/cde/lib/DtSvc/DtUtil2/SunDtHelp.c
+++ b/cde/lib/DtSvc/DtUtil2/SunDtHelp.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
*+E
return(NULL) is correct for the other functions here but not for this
one, since it's meant to return a DtHELP_ error code. The man page also
says it should also set *widget to NULL on error.
---
cde/lib/DtSvc/DtUtil2/SunDtHelp.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --
When building a program foo in-tree, libtool 2.4.6 generates an
executable called lt-foo with a wrapper script called foo. This
means that argv[0] inside the program is lt-foo rather than foo.
This is a problem for dtcodegen, which uses the program name for various
purposes including the "generate
