On 06/13/18 05:09, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
I'm trying to understand what's going on in the following files:
config/cf/DtInfo.rules
config/cf/DtInfo.tmpl
programs/dtinfo/*/Imakefile
As you have major commits in these areas, you seem like the person to
talk to. >
At the beginning
On 06/13/18 01:12, Jon Trulson wrote:
I think I want a signoff from Ulrich on this - I have no way to test.
-jon
Well I can test the patch. But again it will need some time, because it
has to be done on all platforms.
And I'm afraid that these are some critical changes.
On 06/11/2018 10:49
Ulrich Wilkens writes:
> As far as I know the imports/x11/include/Xm (+X11) directory is still
> needed for makedepend. And I wouldn't spend the effort to change makedepend
> not to use them. Let's better get rid of makedepend totally. Then we can
> also remove the imports/x11/include directories
On 06/12/18 13:50, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote:
Ignore the misspelling, lintian throws a warning if the shebang isn't
present
I'm afraid this patch is a little bit too simple:
/usr/bin/tclsh doesn't exist on many systems. Often it is located in
/usr/local/bin
or sometimes also in /usr/p
On 06/12/18 06:49, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
As far as use, an OpenSolaris/OpenIndiana user should be able to just
install their built Motif into /usr/X11 and be done (as that's the
default MotifProjectRoot on Sun systems). You don't even need to
symlink imports/x11/include/Xm anymore. >
As fa
On 06/13/18 01:09, Jon Trulson wrote:
On 06/11/2018 07:52 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Can anyone comment on why we're building with ImportMotif (which appears
to be for building with an in-tree copy of Motif) rather than building
with UseInstalledMotif (which appears to be for building with a s
Hi Ulrich,
I'm trying to understand what's going on in the following files:
config/cf/DtInfo.rules
config/cf/DtInfo.tmpl
programs/dtinfo/*/Imakefile
As you have major commits in these areas, you seem like the person to
talk to.
In particular, there are a lot of sections of code like this:
-
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Christopher Turkel wrote:
I see can see the political reasons for the move and software projects
have moved licenses for worse reasons. I'd like a BSD license of some
kind, I'd be in favor of it.
MIT, and BSD licenses are great. I won't harp on the ones I don't like as
th
Jon Trulson writes:
> As mentioned by Matthew, perhaps we will need to keep this for now,
> make sense now on why it's used. But another option that still
> maintains this funtionality:
>
> dtlogin - move log file to /var/log/dtlogin instead of /var/dt/Xerrors
/var/dt/Xerrors doesn't *not* make
I see can see the political reasons for the move and software projects have
moved licenses for worse reasons. I'd like a BSD license of some kind, I'd
be in favor of it.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:06 PM Matthew R. Trower
wrote:
> Jon Trulson writes:
>
> > Well, I'd like to move to an MIT licens
Jon Trulson writes:
> Well, I'd like to move to an MIT license, but I haven't heard any
> other opinions.
I'd be in favor of moving to the MIT license at some point (or BSD for
that matter, but MIT is what's on the table). I'd be more satisfied
with it politically.
I'm not sure that we *need*
I don't see the point of moving to the MIT license, I'm not against it, I
just don't see the point.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM Jon Trulson wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 05:22 PM, Chase wrote:
> > The headers can be changed with a simple used find and replace.
> >
>
> Which touches a lot of files a
On 06/12/2018 05:22 PM, Chase wrote:
The headers can be changed with a simple used find and replace.
Which touches a lot of files and can be error prone...
It wasn't the install database, my bad, was thinking of something different,
its used in dtinfo, for the library dtmmdb, but the point
On 06/10/2018 08:05 PM, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote:
Putting files on top of /var does cause debian to throw an error due to FHS
violations (https://lintian.debian.org/tags/non-standard-dir-in-var.html), as
does /usr/dt, but its only a warning
(https://lintian.debian.org/tags/non-standar
I think I want a signoff from Ulrich on this - I have no way to test.
-jon
On 06/11/2018 10:49 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Jon Trulson writes:
On 06/08/2018 07:16 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
As for the changes - if a locally compiled motif is required, and it's
customary to install that in
Applied to master, thanks!
-jon
On 06/12/2018 05:50 AM, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote:
Ignore the misspelling, lintian throws a warning if the shebang isn't
present
Thank you for your time,
-Chase
--
Check out
On 06/11/2018 07:52 PM, Matthew R. Trower wrote:
Can anyone comment on why we're building with ImportMotif (which appears
to be for building with an in-tree copy of Motif) rather than building
with UseInstalledMotif (which appears to be for building with a system
installed Motif, e.g. what we act
On 06/11/2018 06:15 PM, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know, what is holding up our move to the MIT license?
Well, I'd like to move to an MIT license, but I haven't heard any other
opinions. I am also not sure what would be involved, or ultimately,
whether there
Ignore the misspelling, lintian throws a warning if the shebang isn't present
Thank you for your time,
-ChaseFrom a46534f2f80e39bb940977e3f60c12a7e1193b03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: chase
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 06:46:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] docnook.tcl: Add shebang
---
cde/programs/dtdocb
19 matches
Mail list logo
