> If you ask me about my wish *in general* I am ready to
> have a serious look at iffe plus I would like to have
> a system that requires as little code generation as possible.
> I like nmake/pmake (BSD make) approach which allows
> to create very simple Makefiles that do not need to be
> regenerat
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Oleksiy Ch wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Let me raise one question: what is a best preferred build system
> you consider for CDE and in general? I address this question to
> people having experience with maintaining *nix software in general and
> writing code in particular.
Given
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Oleksiy Ch wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Let me raise one question: what is a best preferred build system you
> consider for CDE and in general? I address this question to people
> having experience with maintaining *nix software in general and writing
> code in particular.
>
>
Hello guys,
Let me raise one question: what is a best preferred build system you consider
for CDE and in general?
I address this question to people having experience with maintaining *nix
software in general and writing code in particular.
Generally should CDE stay with Imake or move to other s
> > >> And of course, that requires GNU m4 1.4+ "because we need
> >
> > just don't use that macro, if I understand you right
> In this case, I'm talking about regenerating configure.
> If I remember right, auto* drags in perl and GNU m4 1.4+ as dependencies.
That's true. It is a maintainers pro
