On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:30:39AM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>> ... but I'd rather go RoHS.
>
>I would recommend against that. Not unless you are trying to create a
>commercial product where you *must* be RoHS to conform to the requirements
>of the bureaucrats. Use real solder -- the job will be
On 10/12/2015 10:30 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
On Oct 11, 2015, at 12:53 AM, John Wilson wrote:
... but I'd rather go RoHS.
I would recommend against that. Not unless you are trying to create a
commercial product where you *must* be RoHS to conform to the requirements of
the bureaucrats. Use r
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 12:53 AM, John Wilson wrote:
>
> ... but I'd rather go RoHS.
I would recommend against that. Not unless you are trying to create a
commercial product where you *must* be RoHS to conform to the requirements of
the bureaucrats. Use real solder -- the job will be much eas
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:38:45AM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>Did you check the PHY latency for GigE? I know it's insanely large for
>10G-BaseT, but I don't remember if GigE is still reasonable.
I was worried about that, since other PHY data sheets list high-ish numbers
(hundreds of nsec) as if t
On 2015-10-10 2:10 PM, David Bridgham wrote:
Wow. A pretty board indeed. Thanks for showing it off. This is also
interesting to me since a friend and I have been talking about building
something rather similar (and entirely different at the same time, we're
just focusing on the mass storage f
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 9:38 PM, John Wilson wrote:
>
> ... it's
> supposed to be a Q-bus bridge that connects over Ethernet), but I wanted to
> still be able to do something fun in the very likely case that the Ethernet
> port doesn't work (no idea if my PCB layout is kosher for something as fast
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, John Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:48:18PM -0500, Jay Jaeger wrote:
Do U17,U15,U10,U6 perhaps have some solder bridges, or is that just
some flux hanging around?
It's flux, but thanks for the heads-up! I went over everything with
liquid-flux-soaked solder-wick
On 2015-10-10 03:38, John Wilson wrote:
This may never see the light of day (if the prototype turns out to be
stillborn) but it's pretty and I can't resist posting a pic before I've
powered it on and proven its uselessness:
http://www.dbit.com/wilson/projects/qba.jpg
Crazy amounts of p
On 10/9/2015 9:58 PM, John Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:48:18PM -0500, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>> Do U17,U15,U10,U6 perhaps have some solder bridges, or is that just some
>> flux hanging around?
>
> It's flux, but thanks for the heads-up! I went over everything with
> liquid-flux-soaked
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:48:18PM -0500, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>Do U17,U15,U10,U6 perhaps have some solder bridges, or is that just some
>flux hanging around?
It's flux, but thanks for the heads-up! I went over everything with
liquid-flux-soaked solder-wick and a stereo microscope ... there were a
t
Do U17,U15,U10,U6 perhaps have some solder bridges, or is that just some
flux hanging around?
JRJ
On 10/9/2015 8:38 PM, John Wilson wrote:
> This may never see the light of day (if the prototype turns out to be
> stillborn) but it's pretty and I can't resist posting a pic before I've
> powered it
Quite a piece of work. I hope you can continue to plug away at it.
I get that bit about mistakes. Even my simple PIC-based Documation card
reader interface board had a mistake (fortunately, one I could easily
fix without having to create a new board). Fortunately, my Mark-8
boards ended up mist
12 matches
Mail list logo
