Hi Richard
The only ones I'm aware of is this one: Acta Cryst. (1990). A46,
315-320, the one mentioned by Colin: Acta Cryst. (1991). B47, 960-968,
and this review: Crystallography Reviews, (2003), 9, 229-277.
Cheers
-- Ian
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk
> [m
Dear Richard,
A most interesting discussion has ensued!
The balance of elastic versus inelastic scattering becomes the core point re
benefit of moving back the detector as mentioned by Ian. It should be easier
now ie with much more beamtime available to measure this as a function of
wavelength. Co
In the past, individually, I have had issues with both SKETCHER and PRODRG.
A work around that seemed to work for me was building the molecule in
PRODRG, loading it into SKETCHER and then saving it, using the library
file generated by Sketcher for refinement in REFMAC or whatever.
Elbow in PHENIX
Hi Tommi,
Apologies, i know this is not phenix bb but since i am here (and not
subscr. there)
no need to apologize! You can just subscribe to it:
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
how to control rigid body ref positions in phenix.refine, i am trying
to do very low res ch
Dear John
By inelastic I guess you mean the acoustic scattering? In case people
are worried, the change in energy of the x-ray during this interaction
is very small.
Have you any views on the correct treatment for the halo corresponding
to the acoustic scatter (or perhaps for the static case the
