[ccp4bb] Old High B-Factor Issue

2007-06-09 Thread Gregg Crichlow
Dear CCP4 Readers, Quite some time ago, before the CCP4BB changed its server, I posted the following inquiry concerning high B-factors in a protein-DNA complex from a twinned crystal in which most of the DNA was not visible. Dear CCP4BB: We have a protein-DNA complex from a twin

[ccp4bb] problems with phaser for MR

2007-06-09 Thread Ed Wright
Dear All, I can't seem to read my mtz files with 'PHASER for MR' in version ccp4i 6.0.2 running on either a linux or irix system. I can read the mtz files with virtually every other CCP4 subroutine. Any ideas/suggestions? The error I get in the log file is " *

Re: [ccp4bb] Old High B-Factor Issue

2007-06-09 Thread Peter Zwart
Detwinning data and refining against detwinned data is not the best thing to do, especially when you realise that detwinning data with twin fraction larger than 45% is done using model information in CNS: the detwinned data you get out is not experimental anymore. Subsequently, you cannot trust yo

Re: [ccp4bb] problems with phaser for MR

2007-06-09 Thread Tim Grune
Hi, this looks very familiar to me. I am pretty certain you have phenix installed, too, and ccp4i does use the phenix version of phaser, which shows this behaviour. You can test this by typing 'which phaser' from the command line. You should make sure that $CBIN comes before the phenix path, e.g

Re: [ccp4bb] DANO from PDB

2007-06-09 Thread Dale Tronrud
Wouldn't it be reasonable to use the sigma one calculates from the sigmaA? That sigma would reflect the uncertainty in the calculated structure factor amplitude due to the uncertainty in the parameters in your model. Of course, one then realizes that you should down weight you structure facto