Does this mean that, when placing the first (or only) copy of a model,
the score will not be elevated by presence of tNCS (Unless the model contains
domains separated by more or less exactly the distance of the tNCS vector)?
(In general, using a generic MR program that does not correct for TNS.)
S
Dear Yurong,
I just wanted to check that you're using an up-to-date version of Phaser, which
will account for the presence of translational NCS (tNCS). With older versions
of Phaser, you could get apparent solutions that were incorrect but would give
a high LLG just because they satisfied the
Dear Yurong,
your approach to individually refine each potential solution is correct. I do
not know how things are implemented in phenix.refine, but the first thing to
check is that your are using the correct space group as obtained from the MR
program. Some refinement programs use the space g
Brilliant illustration - even in 3D!
eleanor
On 3 Aug 2012, at 14:01, Laurie Betts wrote:
> I couldn't resist this shot. It might not make the cut.but
>
>
"Some people might squawk at 2MB attachments on a BB..."
Surely that is bark :)
One way to address this would be to provide a link to the image on the
web, rather than including it as an attachment.
On 08/03/12 14:04, Francis E Reyes wrote:
Some people might squawk at 2MB attachments on a BB...
But that made my day..
Thanks!
On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:01 AM, Laurie Betts w
Some people might squawk at 2MB attachments on a BB...
But that made my day..
Thanks!
On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:01 AM, Laurie Betts wrote:
> I couldn't resist this shot. It might not make the cut.but
>
>
What symmetry operator is that towel indicating? Must be 24-fold rotational
NCS?
JPK
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Bosch, Juergen wrote:
> Thank Laurie,
>
> what's that domain dangling off your DOG-domain ? And have you checked if
> the off-origin peak is indeed the same height as the origin
Thank Laurie,
what's that domain dangling off your DOG-domain ? And have you checked if the
off-origin peak is indeed the same height as the origin peak ?
May I include your slide in my class ?
Jürgen
On Aug 3, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Laurie Betts wrote:
I couldn't resist this shot. It might not
Oops - sorry to mislead you.
Yes - you are absolutely right..
Eleanor
ale...@pasteur.fr wrote:
Just a small comment on Eleanor's instructive advices :
...
If your original structure has cell
(a2= 47.3, b2=58.9, c2=67.6) and angles (alpha2=90, beta2=99.2, gamma2=90)
and the second cell i
Just a small comment on Eleanor's instructive advices :
> ...
> If your original structure has cell
>
> (a2= 47.3, b2=58.9, c2=67.6) and angles (alpha2=90, beta2=99.2, gamma2=90)
>
> and the second cell is
> (a1=67.5, b1=58.8, c1=98.9) and angles (alpha1=90, beta1=101.5, gamma1=90)
> ...
> I woul
First - there doesnt seem much to worry about. The Rs will be higher
than usual when you have a strong pseudo-translation vector. There are
many weak observations for the h k l=2n+1 reflections.
But in cases like this is is very helpful to force the same indexing on
all your different data set
12 matches
Mail list logo
