Re: [ccp4bb] Introducing an ELN

2012-01-26 Thread Jacob Keller
//www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp >> >> >> Original message ---- >>> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:50:04 +0100 >>> From: CCP4 bulletin board (on behalf of Anastassis >>> Perrakis ) >>> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Introd

Re: [ccp4bb] Introducing an ELN

2012-01-26 Thread Dale Tronrud
b.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123 > http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp > > > Original message >> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:50:04 +0100 >> From: CCP4 bulletin board (on behalf of Anasta

Re: [ccp4bb] Introducing an ELN

2012-01-26 Thread Phoebe Rice
+0100 >From: CCP4 bulletin board (on behalf of Anastassis >Perrakis ) >Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Introducing an ELN >To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > > I think that all these points are interesting and > valid. > On Jan 25, 2012, at 10:37, Chris Morris wrote: > >

Re: [ccp4bb] Introducing an ELN

2012-01-26 Thread Anastassis Perrakis
I think that all these points are interesting and valid. On Jan 25, 2012, at 10:37, Chris Morris wrote: Tassos reports: 1. None of the twenty test-users was satisfied with any of the two solutions - and each was annoyed for a different reason. This suggests that the choice of ELN is not the