Re: [ccp4bb] Difficult MR with MBP fusion protein

2014-05-18 Thread Pascal Egea
Dear Niu, It is very unlikely that MBP will be disordered. We use that protein a standard for SAXS calibration and gel filtration it is extremely well behaved. There is an excellent review about MBP enhanced crystallization (by Moon et al) and you can do a quick survey of the PDB to find the corn

Re: [ccp4bb] Difficult MR with MBP fusion protein

2014-05-16 Thread Gang Dong
Dear Randy, Over the last ~6 years, we have tried to use the MBP tag to enhance crystallization on >10 proteins. Only one that couldn't crystallize by itself in the end crystallized with the fusion tag. However, unfortunately, the target protein (~10 kDa) turned out to be in the big cavity of the

Re: [ccp4bb] Difficult MR with MBP fusion protein

2014-05-16 Thread Randy Read
Dear Niu, When it works, crystallising a fusion protein can be great, with the big advantage that placing a model for the (known) carrier protein gives free phase information. Certainly there are examples of this working, but in the early days of this (20 years or so ago?), I remember hearing

Re: [ccp4bb] Difficult MR with MBP fusion protein

2014-05-16 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam
Hi Niu, Several things come to mind. First, it may not be trivial when the first component to be placed is ~20kDa and the second component (SU) is ~43kDa. The signal after placing the first component may be weak. Also, if the model for the smaller SU has low sequence identity with the target and y