Thank you all for the guidance.
Avisek
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Tim Gruene wrote:
> Dear Avisek,
>
> did you try shelxd for substructure solution? I think that it tries to
> avoid the Uranium solution. There are a couple of caveats with soaks,
> e.g. you are not sure about the number of
Dear Avisek,
did you try shelxd for substructure solution? I think that it tries to
avoid the Uranium solution. There are a couple of caveats with soaks,
e.g. you are not sure about the number of sites and their occupancies.
Occupancies are refined by shelxd, and you can test a few number of
searc
Dear all,
I am trying to phase a large novel structure of 150 kDa with P21 space
group. So far I have collected 3.0A datasets from iodinated derivatives in
Cu-K alpha. In SAD phasing I got 0.745 figure of merit (FOM) and LLG about
476208.27 (sites in inverse hand gave the same FOM and LLG),by Pheni
