Re: [ccp4bb] scala statistics and reindexing

2009-10-15 Thread Phil Evans
Hi Ariel Scaling depends only on the point group, & P222 & P212121 belong to the same point group, so you don't have to scale it again (nor reindex it) Best wishes Phil On 15 Oct 2009, at 21:44, Ariel Talavera wrote: Hi ccp4ers, I firstly integrated the data in P222 but finally the cor

Re: [ccp4bb] scala statistics and reindexing

2009-10-15 Thread Frederic VELLIEUX
:43 > De : "Ariel Talavera" > A : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Copie à : > Objet : [ccp4bb] scala statistics and reindexing > > > Hi ccp4ers, > > I firstly integrated the data in P222 but finally the correct space > group resulted P212121 and I had to rein

Re: [ccp4bb] scala statistics and reindexing

2009-10-15 Thread Jiamu Du
Dear Ariel, The statistics are almost the same. It is not need to rescale the data. Just reindex it into p212121. Best wishes. On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Ariel Talavera wrote: > Hi ccp4ers, > > I firstly integrated the data in P222 but finally the correct space group > resulted P212121 and

[ccp4bb] scala statistics and reindexing

2009-10-15 Thread Ariel Talavera
Hi ccp4ers, I firstly integrated the data in P222 but finally the correct space group resulted P212121 and I had to reindex the data. Are the stats (like Rmerge, number of reflexions, etc) I got from the scala precesses in P222, the same as if I would scale the data in P212121? If not, do I n