Re: [ccp4bb] refmac5.3 vs refmac5.4

2007-12-05 Thread Ian Tickle
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anastassis Perrakis > Sent: 05 December 2007 13:45 > To: Jianghai Zhu > Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] refmac5.3 vs refmac5.4 > > > On Dec 5, 2007

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac5.3 vs refmac5.4

2007-12-05 Thread Anastassis Perrakis
On Dec 5, 2007, at 14:05, Jianghai Zhu wrote: Hi all, I updated refmac5.3 to refmac5.4 and found out that the reported RMSDs are quite different from these two versions even the refining protocols are the same. refmac5.3 rmsBOND rmsANGLE rmsCHIRAL 0.006 0.694

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac5.3 vs refmac5.4

2007-12-05 Thread Garib Murshudov
Weights are the same. 5.4 has a lot of small bug fixes and performance enhancement and some added stability things. And some new features I am planning to announce soon. Since I am responsible, my extremely biased view is that 5.4 is better. Garib On 5 Dec 2007, at 13:05, Jianghai Zhu wrote:

[ccp4bb] refmac5.3 vs refmac5.4

2007-12-05 Thread Jianghai Zhu
Hi all, I updated refmac5.3 to refmac5.4 and found out that the reported RMSDs are quite different from these two versions even the refining protocols are the same. refmac5.3 rmsBOND rmsANGLE rmsCHIRAL 0.006 0.694 0.046 refmac5.4 rmsBOND rmsANGLE rmsCHIRAL