Hi again,
thanks for your replies. Based on the suggestions and since the difference
between the two "conformations" is limited to few residues, the data
statistics do not show any problem, there is no problem with the refinement
and the maps clearly show the two conformations we will keep it like
While I agree with testing in lower symmetry (and I'm sure you have), it is
also possible that the asymmetry is too slight or doesn't affect the crystals
contacts, so that the dimer would orient randomly as it packs into the crystal.
In that case, taking the average over all asymmetric units, t
Briggs
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. April 2019 10:46
> An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Betreff: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] pseudo internal symmetry
>
> Hi,
>
> This doesn't answer your question directly, but I'd be tempted to reduce the
> symmetry and re-refine in a space
bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von David
Briggs
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. April 2019 10:46
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] pseudo internal symmetry
Hi,
This doesn't answer your question directly, but I'd be tempted to reduce the
symmetry and
-
> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Daniele
> de Sanctis
> *Sent:* 03 April 2019 09:36
> *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Subject:* [ccp4bb] pseudo internal symmetry
>
> Hi all,
>
> we have a structure with a pseudo internal symmetry along a
too subtle?
I don't know what PDB rules and regs are though.
HTH,
Dave
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Daniele de
Sanctis
Sent: 03 April 2019 09:36
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] pseudo internal symmetry
Hi all,
we have a structure wi
Hi all,
we have a structure with a pseudo internal symmetry along a 2-fold axis
that sits on a 2-fold crystallographic axis. For refinement purposes we
have modeled the parts that differ with 50% occupancy, but before
depositing the structure we wanted to make sure that this is the best way
to dea
