I don't see how a self rotation function can determine SG. If you processed
data as P1 then found the SR maps showed 3 folds and 2 folds you might
suspect that POINT GROUP!!! (Remember space groups are guessed on the basis
of systematic absences - you don't really know that till you have a
stru
You know that point group has two indexing conventions (h k l and -k,-h,-l
if I remember - see the CCP4 documentation on alternate indexing and use
pointless to sort it out.. Eleanor
. Use pointless to check On Apr 4 2012, Deepthi wrote:
Hello everyone
I have a problem scaling the MAD data wh
Hi -
Let me just add that P312 is a very uncommon space group for protein
crystals, much less common than P321. (This doesn't mean you don't have
it - it's just unlikely.) If you look at PDB statistics:
P 3 1 2 : 12 structures
P3(1) 1 2: 61 structures
P3(2) 1 2: 85 structures
P 3 2 1 : 278
Hello
I arrived at the p312 space group by running a self rotation function using
MOLREP. The maps show the space group as p312. I was scaling the data
individually for each wavelength. None of the three wavelengths are scaling
are scaling in p312 space group.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Clem
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Deepthi wrote:
> Hello everyone
> I have a problem scaling the MAD data which was collected a week ago.The
> data was collected at 1.5A resolution using three wavelengths for Zn-MAD
> experiments. Scaling the data for MAD experiments, the number of rej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Deepthi,
is it just a typo, or do your last two sentences say that your data DO
NOT scale in P312 but scale well in P321?
Did you try pointless for space group determination? I have not used
molrep for this purpose and cannot judge how reliable
:07
Subject: [ccp4bb] problem in scaling the Zn-MAD data
To:
Hello everyone
I have a problem scaling the MAD data which was collected a week ago.The
data was collected at 1.5A resolution using three wavelengths for Zn-MAD
experiments. Scaling the data for MAD experiments, the number of rejections
Hello everyone
I have a problem scaling the MAD data which was collected a week ago.The
data was collected at 1.5A resolution using three wavelengths for Zn-MAD
experiments. Scaling the data for MAD experiments, the number of rejections
and chi2 values were very high even after adjusting the error-
