t: Re: [ccp4bb] pictures in emails
Hi Frank, CCP4bb-ers,
While the progress in the digital world in 2021 over the 90s is undeniable
(which, unfortunately cannot be said about the analog world), we should keep in
mind that some institutional accounts may filter out the "suspiciously" large
Hi Frank, CCP4bb-ers,
While the progress in the digital world in 2021 over the 90s is undeniable
(which, unfortunately cannot be said about the analog world), we should
keep in mind that some institutional accounts may filter out the
"suspiciously" large emails.
I would not be surprised if some of
Ahem. Ed, Tim - the 90s called, they want want their disk space and
email clients back.
As a co-perpertrator of vast volumes of detector data, and religious
proponent of text /formatting/ as inseparable part part the message, I
disagree that in the year 2021, your suggestion still conforms to
Hi Ed, dear ccp4bbs
I fully support your email!
Most email clients have a tick box to include a plain text version in
addition of the html-version in their preferences.
Reading plain text emails instead of the html-version (which is also an
available option for most email clients) is a very eff
letin board On Behalf Of Edward
> Berry
> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 17:17
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] pictures in emails
>
> Two suggestions for people sending pictures of electron density to the BB:
>
> 1. Reduce the size of the pictures-
> The tw
Two suggestions for people sending pictures of electron density to the BB:
1. Reduce the size of the pictures-
The two pictures in yesterday's email appear nice and small in my email client, but still
illustrate what is being described. However they are actually 4032x3024 and 2040x1458
pixels,
