Re: [ccp4bb] m-3m vs. m-3

2008-11-04 Thread Eleanor Dodson
In the $CHTML/twinning.html it tries to explain: From the table: # All *P2i3* and related *2i3* space groups: (h,k,l) already equivalent to (-h,-k,l) so we only need to check: real axes: (a,b,c) and (b,a,-c) reciprocal axes:(a*,b*,c*) and (b*,a*,-c*) /i.e./ rein

[ccp4bb] m-3m vs. m-3

2008-11-03 Thread yanming Zhang
Dear 'old' crystallographers, During one case of structure solution, the data processing programs output incorrect space group-primitive cubic P4132, which later found out that the correct one should be face centerd cubic f23. This problem was caused by perfect twinning. Now I'd like to invite