On 16/10/14 19:31, George Devaniranjan wrote:
Could be a very dumb question, how does this affect COOT I wonder.
I don't see how this could affect Coot.
Sometimes when I use it to look at a PDB, it highlights some maps as
"unreliable"
Of course its relying on EDS +/-5 of the reported value
Hi Kay,
ok, fair point.
Best,
Tim
On 10/14/2014 01:02 PM, Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Tim,
>
> I would not consider this as incorrect! What sftools calculates is R_scale, a
> symmetric version of an R-value. Makes sense when comparing two data sets, or
> two model amplitudes. Clearly, it gives va
Tim,
I would not consider this as incorrect! What sftools calculates is R_scale, a
symmetric version of an R-value. Makes sense when comparing two data sets, or
two model amplitudes. Clearly, it gives values which differ from model R
values. But at least it defines what it prints out.
I put th
Dear all (dear developers),
on a recent discussion on the phenixbb, Nat figured out that sftools
calculates the R-factor incorrectly as
"200*Sum|col1-col2|/sum(col1+col2)"
instead of
"100*Sum|col1-col2|/sum(col1)"
May I suggest to either correct this or not call it Rfactor in order to
avoid fu
