Hi Yafang,
perhaps you should calculate the actual resolution first (as described
here: *Acta Cryst.* (2013). D*69*, 1921-1934) and then go from that?
Pavel
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Yafang Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a structure at 2.45A which has been well refined. However, sinc
erard
> Bricogne [g...@globalphasing.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 5:28 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] how to cut back resolution of a well-refined model
>
> Dear Yafang,
>
> Is it the case that you collected these data on a Pilatus det
out all this.
>
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Gerard
> Bricogne [g...@globalphasing.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 5:28 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] how to cut bac
.
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Gerard Bricogne
[g...@globalphasing.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 5:28 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] how to cut back resolution of a well-refined model
Dear Yafang,
Is it the case
Dear Yafang,
Is it the case that you collected these data on a Pilatus detector,
using relatively low exposure and high multiplicity? These types of datasets
always give what looks like alarmingly high values of R-merge, and many
people who are set in their ways (like so many reviewers still
Please explain how you think that cutting back the resolution will improve your
model
Phil
On 10 Oct 2013, at 21:57, Yafang Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a structure at 2.45A which has been well refined. However, since the
> R-merge at the last shell is above 1 (although I/sigmaI at the la
Hi All,
I have a structure at 2.45A which has been well refined. However, since the
R-merge at the last shell is above 1 (although I/sigmaI at the last shell
is more than 2), we now decide to cut back the resolution to about 2.6A. Is
there a way to do this based on the well-refined model instead o
