rity of our computer systems and checking compliance with our Code of
> Conduct and policies.
>
>
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Tommi
> Kajander
> Sent: 20 December 2011 16:19
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] den
d not necessarily expect NCS related bits of the density to be fully
identical.
JED.
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Tommi
Kajander
Sent: 20 December 2011 16:19
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] density mod., NSC and software..
Dea
Dear all,
Stupid question: if i do density modification (flattening and extension say
from 6 to 4Å)
w/o averaging on a symmetrical, say dimer, would you expect the thing stays
symmetric nevertheless?
(in particular if there is a strong peak in the NCS??) (seems to me it doenst
necessarily...)