--- Marius Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> Dear colleagues,
> I was wondering whether someone of you has
> reported/published
> new or improved crystallographic software somewhere
> else than Acta Cryst. It would be nice if you could
> share your experience with me. Topics might be:
> - qu
Thanks for the insight into how the system works. I see now why the
procedings go out in January. I am not encouraged by the logic of the
system. h-factors will probably help though.
Acta D should improve a bit in 2006, since one paper alone from the 2004
procedings was cited 326 times in 2006
Do you have any data to support the implication that Acta F will have
a lower citation factor than Acta D?
Checked a web of sciences "Citation report" for a search with the year
2005 and "source titles":
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY "AND"
CRYSTALLIZATION COMMUNICATI
On Monday 19 February 2007 11:39, Jon Wright wrote:
> Acta D is likely to improve again following the creation of Acta F in 2005.
Do you have any data to support the implication that Acta F will have
a lower citation factor than Acta D?
FWIW, the impact factor of Acta D was down in 2005 relative
Kevin Cowtan wrote:
Acta D has for some reason a rather poor impact rating, and J. Appl.
Cryst. a rather better one.
There is no outlier rejection in the calculations for journal citation
reports (eg: impact factors).
Congratulations to: Spek AL, "Single-crystal structure validation with
t
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Charles Ballard
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 3:37 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crytstallographic software
Interestingly enough (or not as the case maybe), the CCP4 study
weekend now goes out as the January issue of Acta D in order to try
and raise
Interestingly enough (or not as the case maybe), the CCP4 study
weekend now goes out as the January issue of Acta D in order to try
and raise the impact rating. Something to do with the scoring
working on a calendar year.
Charles
On 19 Feb 2007, at 10:50, Kevin Cowtan wrote:
J. Appl. Cr
J. Appl. Cryst.
I have used it for things which I think need publishing, but are of more
abstract subjects and less direct interest to the biological
crystallography.
However, politics and finances may dictate otherwise. Acta D has for
some reason a rather poor impact rating, and J. Appl. Cr
Dear colleagues,
I was wondering whether someone of you has reported/published
new or improved crystallographic software somewhere
else than Acta Cryst. It would be nice if you could
share your experience with me. Topics might be:
- quality of the journal
- rapid publication
- literate peers
- ...
