t-resolution shell becomes irrelevant; one can simply cite the
> > "effective resolution". I hope this can help.
> >
> > With best regards,
> >
> > Sacha Urzhumtsev
> >
> >
> > De : CCP4 bulletin
humtsev
>
>
> De : CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] de la part de Dale
> Tronrud [de...@daletronrud.com]
> Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:20
> À : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Objet : Re: [ccp4bb] crystallographic confusion
>
> -B
Hello,
I read your paper and it seems very relevant to the present discussion (and
> future referee comments). Have the criteria that you propose for
> determining the effective resolution been implemented in any program or
> crystallographic suite in way that we can read in a data set and get out
UK] on behalf of William G. Scott
[wgsc...@ucsc.edu]
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 11:41 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crystallographic confusion
Dear Arnon et al:
My understanding of the Shannon/Nyquist sampling theorem is admittedly
extremely rudimentary, but I think al
-1710
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Alexandre
OURJOUMTSEV [sa...@igbmc.fr]
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 12:41 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crystallographic confusion
Dear Dale, dear Kay,
last year
10. 25% for 2.5A data. 15% for 1.5A data.
Anthony Duff
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Tom Peat
Sent: Saturday, 19 April 2014 6:03 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crystallographic confusion
As has been alluded
CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] de la part de Dale Tronrud
[de...@daletronrud.com]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:20
À : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Objet : Re: [ccp4bb] crystallographic confusion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I see no problem with saying that the model
m G. Scott
[wgsc...@ucsc.edu]
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 11:41 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crystallographic confusion
Dear Arnon et al:
My understanding of the Shannon/Nyquist sampling theorem is admittedly
extremely rudimentary, but I think aliasing can result if an
Dear Arnon et al:
My understanding of the Shannon/Nyquist sampling theorem is admittedly
extremely rudimentary, but I think aliasing can result if an arbitrary
brick-wall resolution cut-off to the data is applied.
So let’s say there are real data are to 2.0 Å resolution. Applying the 2.2 Å
cut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I see no problem with saying that the model was refined against every
spot on the detector that the data reduction program said was observed
(and I realize there is argument about this) but declare that the
"resolution of the model" is a number bas
Dear Kay.
Arguably, the resolution of a structure is the most important number to
look at; it is definitely the first to be examined, and often the only one
examined by non-structural biologists.
Since this number conveys so much concerning the quality/reliability of
the the structure, it is not
Hi everybody,
since we seem to have a little Easter discussion about crystallographic
statistics anyway, I would like to bring up one more topic.
A recent email sent to me said: "Another referee complained that the
completeness in that bin was too low at 85%" - my answer was that I
consider
12 matches
Mail list logo
