Joel,
Agh. I can honestly say that this explanation never occurred to
me, even though it is consistent with the data (But come on, any
introductory organic chem text explains the R/S rules by moving from
atom 2 to 3 to 4, and not by jumping from 2 to 4...surely you would
follow the s
For CB_ILE, the chiral volume sign in the REFMAC monomer library is the
same as used by SHELXL, not the opposite as stated in my last posting.
Apologies!
George
Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49
>
> Thx, BR
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of George
> M. Sheldrick
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:17 AM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] chiral volumes--2nd try
>
>
> Ber
> Then you have to define what you mean by "smallest".
Correct. A little manual reading often goes along way :-)
br
to +34 deg."
>
> p 630 ;-)
>
> BR
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
> Patrick Loll
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:40 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] chiral volumes--2n
al Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
Patrick Loll
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:40 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] chiral volumes--2nd try
Sorry, the original post looks garbled (mirroring my internal state,
no doubt). I'm trying
Sorry, the original post looks garbled (mirroring my internal state,
no doubt). I'm trying again, sending as plain text:
Friends,
A question about the definition of chiral volumes:
I'm looking for the definition of the SIGN of a chiral volume. The
only ccp4 reference I can find (readily) i
