On Dec 8, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Ed Pozharski wrote:However, I'd see no harm in posting just a small cutout of the map in the region ofinterest. It's not a difficult task (fft/mapmask or perhaps some usfmagic), but is there some user-friendly approach to cutting out a smallmap volume? There's probably
; -Original Message-
>> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Mark J
>> van Raaij
>> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:50 PM
>> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] better way to post your density snapshots
>&
There is indeed the phenix.cut_out_density tool (by Tom Terwilliger)
which does a nice job of reducing the size of the output mtz-file (it
shifts the cutout region to the origin and reduces the unit cell).
On the link-versus-attachment issue, certainly the link is preferred,
but the aforementioned
board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Mark J
> van Raaij
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:50 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] better way to post your density snapshots
>
> posting these attachments as links rather than attachments in CCP4bb messa
[mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Mark J
van Raaij
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:50 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] better way to post your density snapshots
posting these attachments as links rather than attachments in CCP4bb messages
is the way to go I think.
many
posting these attachments as links rather than attachments in CCP4bb messages
is the way to go I think.
many institutions offer this service (ours does), and there are also free and
for-pay online ways to do this (for example www.yousendit.com, but there are
many others).
Then it is also not a p
Colleagues,
One recurring question on this bb is "I got this blob of density - is it
my ligand or what in the name of pink unicorns this is?" Often, a
screen snapshot is posted, which is very helpful. But it may be better
if those helping out could rotate density around in 3D. Understandably,
p
