The total model that fits the observable electron density should be the
standard for the PDB FASTA file with the deposited structure factors, however,
not all depositions contain a link to the expression construct details because
many are not published, and I believe that it should be explicitly
On 03/27/2012 12:20 PM, Ethan Merritt wrote:
On Monday, 26 March 2012, Francois Berenger wrote:
Dear list,
If I take all the fasta files for proteins in the PDB,
are the sequences complete?
I mean, do they have holes sometimes (missing amino acids)?
In theory the SEQRES records describe the
On Monday, 26 March 2012, Francois Berenger wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> If I take all the fasta files for proteins in the PDB,
> are the sequences complete?
>
> I mean, do they have holes sometimes (missing amino acids)?
In theory the SEQRES records describe the sequence of the
entity that was cryst
I think that depends on what the depositor considered complete.
Just as an example the construct you cloned say from residue 20 - 380 would you
consider that complete or would you consider only the sequence complete if it
contained the first 20residues ?
Regarding the gaps in terms of missing res
Dear list,
If I take all the fasta files for proteins in the PDB,
are the sequences complete?
I mean, do they have holes sometimes (missing amino acids)?
Sorry for the maybe stupid question but I know that sometimes
the PDB files have missing residues, I am hoping that
it is not the case with t
