age-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul D. Adams
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:17 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Why wwPDB and members are doing a poor job.
Joe,
I think this is neither a constructive or accurate statement.
o: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Why wwPDB and members are doing a poor job.
Joe,
I think this is neither a constructive or accurate statement. I
have collaborated with the PDB (both the RCSB and the EBI) for many
years and I believe that they are doing a very good jo
Joe,
I think this is neither a constructive or accurate statement. I
have collaborated with the PDB (both the RCSB and the EBI) for many
years and I believe that they are doing a very good job under very
difficult circumstances. They have been tasked with curating an ever
increasing vol
This is a reply to the below message posted under "[ccp4bb] The
importance of USING our validation tool", which is a rather long thread now.
This is part of why I claim that wwPDB and its members are doing a bad
job. They have worked to systematically remove "general purpose"
information that does
