evable
from all wwPDB partner sites.
Regards,
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Martyn
Symmons
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:44 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] What kind of reflection data to deposi
Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Martyn
Symmons
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:44 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] What kind of reflection data to deposit to PDB
Sorry to contradict,
But the mmCIF data model cert
Sorry to contradict,
But the mmCIF data model certainly does not seem to require hkl unique
within the reflection data.
Like CIF the mmCIF formalism has been developed to allow a complete
description of a diffraction experiment and the data arising from it.
There is a full description at
ht
Dear all,
At present, unmerged data cannot be handled properly as part of a PDB
deposition. One reason for this is that changes to the mmCIF/PDBx data model
will be required (at the moment, hkl must be unique within the reflection
data, which is logical for merged data but precludes handling o
2 -1 15 o 189.0 6.2 178.5 6.8
<>
From: Raji Edayathumangalam
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Sent: Friday, 6 September 2013, 3:42
Subject: [ccp4bb] What kind of reflection data to deposit to PDB
Hi Folks,
Sorry for the non-ccp4 pos
Hi Folks,
Sorry for the non-ccp4 post.
I am trying to determine what is the best form of unmerged reflection data
to deposit to the PDB. I have single wavelength anomalous data for my
structure and I have two flavors of scaled files from the same exact set of
diffraction images: (1) data indexed
