gt;
> *Van: *Kay Diederichs
> *Verzonden: *woensdag 1 maart 2017 23:38
> *Aan: *CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Onderwerp: *Re: [ccp4bb] Twinning and R-Free
>
>
> Hi Alun,
>
> that's difficult to understand for me. It is my understanding that for an
> imperfect model, refmac will i
Diederichs<mailto:kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de>
Verzonden: woensdag 1 maart 2017 23:38
Aan: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Onderwerp: Re: [ccp4bb] Twinning and R-Free
Hi Alun,
that's difficult to understand for me. It is my understanding that for an
imperfect m
Hi Alun,
1. What does phenix.xtriage think of the dataset?
2. What kind of redundancy do you have in the dataset?
3. Sometimes with a large crystal and a small beam the twin fraction varies as
you rotate the crystal and illuminate different parts of the crystal (which can
have different twin fra
Hi Alun,
that's difficult to understand for me. It is my understanding that for an
imperfect model, refmac will indicate a twin fraction >0 even if in reality it
is 0. But alpha=0.372 sounds too high for that.
My questions would be -
a) is it a single dataset, or did you merge ? If the latter, i
Hi Everyone,
I have a (2.5 - 2.3 Angstroms) data set the process as I4 or I222.
Aimless indicates twinning in both space groups and all the lower
symmetry space groups consistent with the reduced cell. Molecular
replacement works in I4 but not I222 etc. I can see new density for a
ligand we a
