what is this discussion about? please, try to be reasonable
Bohdan, structbio.org/bs
On 2019-02-01 10:05, vincent Chaptal wrote:
Hi Leo,
are you asking the question from the point of view of the user, or from
the beamline scientist allocating beamtime?
different answers then!
best
Vincent
On
Hi Leo,
are you asking the question from the point of view of the user, or from
the beamline scientist allocating beamtime?
different answers then!
best
Vincent
On 01/02/2019 09:42, CHAVAS Leonard wrote:
Dear all
I had one interesting comment today at the beamline, that I would like to share
graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk
Sent: 01 February 2019 08:48
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Thoughtful remark...
Dear Leo,
I would argue that not getting diffraction would indicate that the sample under
study is not a crystal ;-)
That way the two scenarios are the same - in neither
This is easy - a crystal not diffracting in the loop provides a datum -
that crystal or object does not diffract. No crystal in the loop
provides no information on the system you are studying beyond the skill
of the person fishing.
Cheers, Matt,
On 2/1/2019 9:48 AM, graeme.win...@diamond.ac
Dear Leo,
I would argue that not getting diffraction would indicate that the sample under
study is not a crystal ;-)
That way the two scenarios are the same - in neither case do you have a crystal
in the loop
All the best Graeme
> On 1 Feb 2019, at 08:42, CHAVAS Leonard
> wrote:
>
> Dea
Dear all
I had one interesting comment today at the beamline, that I would like to share
with you for your advice on how to answer this...
Is it better to have no diffraction from a crystal you shoot, or to have no
crystal in the loop?
Hum, difficult one...
Cheers, leo
-
Leonard Chavas
-
Sy
