I find that in a large proportion of cases depth-cued graphics
without
stereo are enough (e.g. quickly examining a structure, rebuilding in
a
refined map, tracing at 2.4 A), and indeed I do most of my graphics
work on a laptop.
But, when you are lost in a poorly-phased 3.5 A map of a structure
yo
Me too.
I use coot quite a lot too.
In my case though, I don't have hardware rendering because I don't
know how to enable it and can't be bothered to find out.
It's fine as it it - spending more than 1000 GBP on a computer to run
CCP4 and Coot seems excessive (I don't use stereo in any of its
To steal the words from one of my favorite cartoon shows, to me stereo is
just a headache with pictures.
Artem
(the show is Futurama)
> I was just curious to see how popular stereo graphics is for
> crystallographers. I personally think its a wonderful teaching tool which
> is
> currently under-
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Survey on computer usage in crystallography
Hi,
If you build a system without stereo graphics, and use a standard
monitor, I
agree. In-fact it can be done for for under ~$1000. However, stereo
systems
are rather expensive (LCD stereo systems are VERY expensiv
graphics is for
crystallographers. I personally think its a wonderful teaching tool
which is currently under-utilized.
Paul
From: Bart Hazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Survey on computer usage in crystallography
Date: W
More likely the issue is that some of us do not find stereo to be
necessary of beneficial for crystallographic model building.
In which case, given the power of modern PCs and graphics cards, a basic
off-the-shelf PC costing $1000/£500 is completely adaquate for typical
structure solution and
crystallographers. I personally think its a wonderful teaching tool which is
currently under-utilized.
Paul
From: Bart Hazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Survey on computer usage in crystallography
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:28:25 -0
be greatly appreciated.
Paul
From: "David J. Schuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "David J. Schuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Survey on computer usage in crystallography
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:18:44 -0400
On Tue, 2007-0
I don't expect the "I'd be willing to assemble one from parts for under
USD $2000" crowd will be large but you don't have to do the assembling
to get all you need well under the $2000 mark. The times that you needed
the fastest computer money could buy and still spent lots of time in the
librar
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 21:09 -0700, P Hubbard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am doing a survey on computer usage in crystallography. The questionnaire
> can be found on the following web page:
>
> http://www.bioscienceforum.com/survey.html
...
I don't care for the way several questions are posed. Exampl
Hi all,
I am doing a survey on computer usage in crystallography. The questionnaire
can be found on the following web page:
http://www.bioscienceforum.com/survey.html
Its point-and-click, with 10 short questions, and should take under 2
minutes to complete. You are not requested to enter you
11 matches
Mail list logo
